Describe your ideas about the question

Describe your ideas about the question on whether students should participate in politics or not

 

  Should students participate in politics or not may be a question of quite modern origin. Till the start of this century nobody would have thought of this question. That was a time when students simply obeyed their parents and masters. Parents never even discussed matter as important because the marriage of their son or daughter. Teachers were absolute monarchs of their classroom. Children remained in awe and fear of teachers. Politics was quite young and it had been the privilege of the few within the higher rungs of society. The man within the street was never within the picture and his voice was never head in the least .

 The beginning of the century saw the spirit of nationalism rising up in many colonial countries against the ruler. The leaders of such movements called on the youth of the land to hitch them. They knew that it might be futile to deal with their energy to the center age bracket . Their appeal for action went straight to the hearts of the kids . They were a touch rash and reckless for that they had not much to lose but the guarantees for his or her gain were there. They left off their studies, deserted their classes only to hitch the front rank of politicians who were trying to form their voices felt. The youth had the energy and will observe noise. Mass movements required them. Thus there was a revolution in politics when the youths began to form their presence felt. Many a leader of the 40s and fifties belong to the present category.

 So we see with the advancing of the century the part played by the youth in politics intensified. Politics in many countries became a mass movement and youth leaders were in great demand, because they might muster strength easily. Once the part played by the youth became significant, the youth began to say . They wanted their share within the government of the country and their voices to be heard.

 That is where we stand today. Forceful leaders who knew the facility of youth in politics began to voice their concern and began telling that students may study politics, the manifesto of varied parties but not to indulge in active politics. But that was never to be. Once the youth has been roused it's very difficult to regulate them and unfortunately many elections are fought with the assistance of the youth. So in theory , allow us to concede there's nothing wrong within the youth participating in politics.

 But if the last word goal of the politician is to enter the legislature of the land and participate in shaping her destinies then the youth must wait within the 'Q'. Their youthful enthusiasm and emotional outbursts are not quite the thing that the government of the country needs. It required maturity, wisdom and forbearance. Politics is not mountain climbing. Hard training may make one a good mountaineer. To be an official one must be groomed from a young age, be intelligent, wise, mature in outlook and have vision and foresight. He must be dedicated towards a mission and therefore the people. Despite all their enthusiasm, the youth isn't qualified on this score. His very youth is a disqualification. They cannot be said to have emotional maturity. So just like the young seed that waits to become ripe, the scholars must wait.

 A word of caution to the professional politicians here may not be inappropriate. Let them watch out for what dangerous powers they're twiddling with . The very mass strength of the youth might destroy the citadel of politics like Samson chained . It may be cheaper now but surely it is going to be costlier in the long run. Let the youth of the land gather knowledge, devour the intelligence and get older in wisdom in order that they'll be fit shoulder the responsibility. So one should check out this problem from a historical perspective. In all humility one may conclude that the scholar should never participate in active politics.